Haidian Minds Converge · Jing-Zhang Stars Aglow: Tiangong Star Atlas AI Civic Living Room

v1.2 review thesis: Tiangong Civic Protocol. Every AI service entering public space passes six gates: question register, data permission, spatial capacity, human takeover, 90-day review, and renewal/exit. This does not add statutory planning; it translates Tianwen, Nuwa, and Yinglong into explainable, participatory, pausable, and reversible delivery discipline. ^{Source Depth}

Design Proposition and Data Boundary

The proposal translates the Jing-Zhang Railway's legacy of mobility and innovation into civic innovation infrastructure for the next century. AI should become understandable, optional, and correctable in streets, communities, and parks, rather than remain confined to laboratories. The core structure stays unchanged: three corridors, three cores, two wings, and one loop. Tianwen stands for inquiry and explainability, Nuwa for connection and co-governance, and Yinglong for water-sensitive resilience. ^{Source Source}

The repository currently contains no verifiable official GIS/CAD redlines, regulatory controls, ownership, existing-building inventory, utility capacity, ecology, or heritage vector data. The approximately 11.4 sq km boundary and three key areas come from the organizer-provided provisional_boundaries.geojson. They support concept composition, task allocation, and local checks only, not statutory boundaries, precise area claims, demolition decisions, or engineering commitments. ^{Source Spatial data Standard}

Three Scales and Regional Collaboration

The approximately 43.6 sq km research scope connects northern Haidian innovation resources, the Jing-Zhang corridor, and everyday services. The provisional 11.4 sq km overall design scope organizes the three-corridor network. The three key areas host near-term spatial prototypes that can be tested, assessed, and withdrawn. ^{Metric Metric}

Regional collaboration uses explicit complementary interfaces: model evaluation, talent services, and civic issues connect to Zhongguancun and Beiwei Community; research-validation briefs connect to Future Science City and Huairou Science City; pilot production and commercialization services connect to Beijing E-Town; and cross-regional urban challenges reach the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei network. Each relationship starts with a public brief, short residency, or joint evaluation, and expands only after responsibilities, budgets, and data agreements are confirmed.

Tiangong Star Atlas: Three Corridors, Three Cores

The Tianwen Knowledge Corridor combines explainable wayfinding, Jing-Zhang memory, open research, and multilingual communication. The Nuwa Weaving Corridor connects residents, researchers, and service staff through civic tables, trusted-data collaboration, and human review. The Yinglong Water-Vein Corridor combines rain gardens, shade, microclimate notices, and slow mobility as tangible resilience infrastructure. They connect the Zhongzhiyuan R&D accelerator, AI Origin civic incubator, and Dazhongsi industry-experience core, supported by the Zhongguancun service wing, Xiaoyue River scenario wing, and a continuous slow-mobility loop. ^Depth

Five functions form one loop: original research generates questions and models; validation and transfer provides controlled testing; talent community supports living and exchange; public experience builds understanding and trust; urban resilience applies technology to real conditions. The identity system uses a Jing-Zhang trajectory as warp, Haidian innovation nodes as weft, and three core stars as markers. Its wordmarks are “天工星图” and “TIANGONG STAR ATLAS,” with no copied institutional marks, character imagery, or unlicensed typefaces.

Global references are mechanisms, not forms to copy: Kendall Square's academic-industry public interface, Station F's integrated startup service, Vector Institute's open research network, the Alan Turing Institute's interdisciplinary collaboration, Barcelona Supercomputing Center's public science communication, Seoul Digital Media City's scenario integration, reversible civic prototypes, and open-source maintainer communities. Their local translations are shared ground floors, staffed service desks, an annual challenge list, four-party governance, explainable galleries, controlled test streets, 90-day pilots, and a contribution wall. Local regulation, operating cost, and public impact must be reviewed before adoption. ^{Spatial data}

Eight-resource ecosystem map and civic protocol

Land, space, industry, capital, talent, compute, data, and scenarios form one staged-access loop. The Zhongguancun Technology Services Wing brings resources in; Zhongzhiyuan frames questions and tests models; AI Origin translates them into public services; Dazhongsi completes product and cultural exchange; the Xiaoyue River wing carries validated scenarios into everyday use. Every transfer carries an accountable owner, data permission, and an exit condition. Capital, procurement, and policy are conceptual mechanisms, not confirmed commitments. ^{Spatial data Spatial data}

Overall Urban Design and Renewal

Three future-street prototypes bring the structure to the ground. Tianwen Star-Rail Street organizes booked low-speed shuttles, walking, cycling, flexible curbs, and low-glare guidance. Nuwa Weave Street combines permeable tree pits, demountable civic tables, accessible micromobility, and quiet-priority crossings. Yinglong Water-Mirror Loop links shallow rain gardens, shade, and switchable water-level notices. ^{Spatial data Spatial data Spatial data}

Four replaceable building prototypes translate the idea into civic interfaces: Tianwen Cloud Terrace links research, model evaluation, and a public gallery; Nuwa Weave Nest organizes live-work studios and repair spaces around a shared court; Yinglong Water Court uses a lifted public floor, rain garden, and deep eaves; Star Atlas Interface combines accessible transfer, public service, and changing exhibitions. ^{Spatial data Metric}

Renewal follows “inventory before intervention.” Once building age, structure, ownership, use, and historic value are verified, professional teams can classify maintenance, program infill, energy retrofit, interface opening, and conditional replacement. Until then, the proposal makes no parcel-level claim about demolition, floor-area ratio, height, or development quantity. ^Depth

Action Briefs for Three Key Areas

The provisional polygons are not formal parcels, but they can carry explicit program tasks, accountable roles, gates, and indicators. Once official data arrives, teams must run spatial conflict checks and relocate each task to a suitable parcel. A conflict with redlines, heritage, ownership, or capacity means moving, reducing, or cancelling the prototype, never altering official geometry to fit the concept. ^{Spatial data}

The three first pilots are a model-evaluation sandbox, civic co-creation table, and climate-aware walking segment. Each runs for 90 days and produces a baseline, operations log, public feedback record, human-review record, and exit report. A pilot that fails safety, inclusion, or maintenance gates cannot become permanent.

AI Ecosystem, Personas, and Scenarios

The proposal serves algorithm researchers, startup product teams, residents and older adults, visiting students, public-service staff, accessible-mobility users, and international developers. Six explicit personas bind needs, space, non-digital access, and measurement, rather than treating “the public” as one abstract user group. Every scenario follows minimum necessary data, plain-language notice, opt-out, human takeover, and appeal. ^{Spatial data}

The first three are controlled industrial validation settings. The others translate technical capability into public value instead of substituting screens and sensors for spatial design. ^Metric

Mobility, Blue-Green Network, and Public Realm

Network priority is walking and wheelchairs, cycling, booked low-speed shuttles, maintenance, then emergency access. Flexible curbs can switch among pickup, logistics, rain-garden pause, and events by time, while keeping a continuous accessible path. Computing, energy, communications, drainage, and fire safety use a “maintainable interface + aggregate load monitoring + staged professional review” approach without presuming capacity. ^Depth

The Jing-Zhang Memory Corridor uses a verified railway timeline; Tianwen uses low-glare, switchable star-atlas guidance; Yinglong lets rain storage, shade, and civic activity share space. Three landmarks are conceptual programming components: Tiangong Cloud Terrace hosts explainable-AI exhibits, Nuwa Weaving Table hosts civic collaboration, and Yinglong Water-Vein Platform hosts multilingual culture and climate experience. A fourth Star Atlas Contribution Wall records human-reviewed public versions without promising selection or permanent construction. ^{Spatial data Spatial data}

Public-space components, honor display, and cultural narrative

Six replaceable components make the protocol legible without relying on a giant screen: a protocol plaque shows purpose, owner, data boundary, and expiry; a demountable table hosts co-creation; a staffed desk provides non-digital access and appeal; low-glare star guidance joins history and scenario; a rain-sensing node makes water and maintenance visible; and a contribution archive stores reviewed open outputs. ^{Spatial data}

East-west stitching uses demountable tables, accessible crossings, and low-glare guidance; north-south continuity uses the memory corridor, three-core entrances, and the Water-Mirror Loop. The three pilgrimage landmarks are not entertainment objects: each offers a reason to visit by explaining one technology, joining one collaboration, or witnessing one climate feedback. The wall displays only public, licensed, and human-reviewed versions. ^Depth

The cultural story has three acts: “the switchback rail” for engineering judgment and public responsibility; “the open atlas” for Zhongguancun research, startups, and open collaboration; and “the reversible city” for preserving choice after AI enters everyday life. The guidance language uses trajectory, latitude-longitude, three stars, and water-level marks as abstract symbols; it does not imitate historic fabric or use portraits. International line: “Every AI service entering the city leaves public evidence that can be explained, joined, paused, and exited.” ^{Spatial data Source}

Minimum inclusion gates are a continuous accessible route, seating and shade, low glare and quiet hours, non-digital access for children and older adults, multilingual and large-print information, and staffed service without a smartphone. Public access must never depend on identification, scoring, or profiling.

Phasing, Accountability, and Long-Term Operation

Long-term operation uses a four-party forum of developer community, resident representatives, professional advisers, and data governance. It publishes quarterly problem and incident logs, and annual maintenance cost, public use, scenario performance, and retired projects. Procurement, events, and technology partners follow transparent rules. ^{Spatial data}

Four-season annual operating calendar

Event brands, partners, budgets, procurement and international exchange remain conceptual recommendations. The calendar turns “long-term operation” into inspectable annual outputs rather than a promise that events will occur. ^{Spatial data Depth}

Metrics, Replacement Protocol, and Compliance

The package records provisional site area, prototype building footprint, green ratio, public-space ratio, and key-area count. Structured layers make them reproducible, but missing official geometry limits area and ratio values to internal consistency checks. ^{Metric Metric Metric Metric}

When official GIS/CAD arrives, the replacement order is: verify source and coordinate system; preserve a read-only original; overlay boundaries, roads, ownership, heritage, ecology, and utilities; relocate key-area tasks; recalculate every area and ratio; update GeoJSON, metrics, narratives, figures, PDFs, HTML, matrices, and manifest hashes together; obtain planning, mobility, utilities, architecture, accessibility, fire, and other required professional sign-off. Until every step is complete, the package remains conceptual. ^Source

Risks, Copyright, and Open Boundary

Main risks are relocation after boundary replacement, ownership or heritage constraints, utility capacity, algorithmic error, digital exclusion, and failed long-term maintenance. Responses are movable prototypes, early professional review, capacity gates, human takeover, non-digital service, and annual exit evaluation. See report/copyright_statement.md for sources, generation methods, and personal-data limits. This proposal is not government approval, investment commitment, or a construction basis. ^{Source Spatial data}

References

1. Beijing Municipal Commission of Planning and Natural Resources, public call for the Centennial Jing-Zhang AI Innovation Belt, 2026. 2. Project site package, brief/site-package/, 2026. 3. Agent Taskbook for the open urban-design call, 2026. 4. Local reference snapshot of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development's Measures for the Administration of Urban Design.